According to the MV and ME charts it looks like about a toss-up. One can also assume that if an item costs more, it must also be superior as well. So, we’re going to compare the ballistic performance, stopping power, recoil and other attributes of the 38 Spl and the 9mm. In fact, it’s actually considered as an explosive. It isn’t really possible to avoid the revolver vs. semi-auto thing in this discussion. Snub-nose revolvers are very popular for the fact that they’re so simple and many people go that route regardless of what’s available in semiautomatics. I think it’s more a function of poorly crimped ammo, and maybe limp wristing, than it is a problem with an individual gun. Reason being is that the 99% of all 38 specials out there are revolvers, and the ammo manufactures do not need to generate enough energy to cycle a slide, like they do for 9mm. Depends on the load: A.38 Special +P or +P+ semi-jacketed hollow point round is a better man-stopper than ball.9mm ammo. I personally prefer bullets on the heavy side. Here with a Colt 1991 in 38 Super on the left and an XSE Gov. Yes, bullet creep can happen, although I’ve not had it happen in my LCR without forcing it to happen. It can be referred to as the “9mm Parabellum”. https://www.luckygunner.com/labs/self-defense-ammo-ballistic-tests/#9mm, https://www.luckygunner.com/labs/revolver-ballistics-test/. The 9mm cartridge also delivers less felt recoil than similar calibers, While a .22 LR has a felt recoil measured in ounces, a 124 grain 9mm round generates around 4.5 lbs of felt recoil while the larger 160 grain .40 S&W generates 50% more felt recoil – coming in at 6.3 lbs on average. if you reload, 38 and 357 are awfully flexible. If you own a revolver with a 12lb DA, I strongly suggest a qualified gunsmith. I’ve only looked at the mountains of ballistic test data available for both calibers…. The clear enough answer is that they are generally more reliable than semi-auto pistols. When I fell on hard times a few years ago, I sold the Shield and kept the 642. All excellent and truthful points. … so long as you choose a loading that plays to the strengths of each. What Foghorn said… I think both cartridges can stand on their own for self defense use, so long as you choose a loading that plays to the strengths of each. In a nutshell, both cartridges work similarly: they can both be considered older designs, they were both developed primarily for use in handguns, they use practically the same diameter bullets which punch holes that are pretty much the same size, and they’re both popular and available all over the world despite their age. There are several aspects where the .38 Special can do things the 9×19 cannot: – The .38 Special can be loaded with significantly heavier bullets than the 9×19; the common defense load for the .38 is a 158 grain JHP, but if you cast your own, there are bullet molds that will allow you to cast bullets over 200 grains. The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .327 Federal Magnum vs .38 Special ammo rounds. He, unfortunately, received injuries to his body while serving, that included cracked vertebrae and injuries to both his knees and his shoulder, resulting in several surgeries. “A disadvantage (of revolvers) to automatics is that they can have more complicated stoppages that require both hands to clear.” Given all factors being equal, the.38 Super recoils slightly more than the 9mm load. So let’s explore this topic some more in our 9mm vs .38 Special comparison…. is indistinguishable to most people who hear it. I don’t doubt that modern advances in bullet design and construction have done the .38 a lot of favors, but I wouldn’t buy one to carry over something like an M&P Shield 9. http://ballisticsbytheinch.com/38special.html. Mark a cartridge, load the cylinder, shoot all but the marked cartridge, reload and leave the marked cartridge in place, and again shoot all but the marked cartridge. Third, almost everyone thinks (whether right or wrong) that hollowpoints are the best possible bullet design so that is where the market is and that is what ammunition manufacturers produce. Also, if the weights of both calibers are evenly increased, the differences between the two cartridges remain the same. While those 9mm bullets would expand to similar diameters, they would not make the same gaping hole as those .38 Special full wadcutters because the 9mm bullets would have significantly rounded edges. Don’t think so. Shooters commonly choose a weight of around 125 grains for a lighter recoil. A quality JHP 147 grain 9mm will expand to around .65-.75 inches and penetrate around 15 inches. It is the cartridge of choice for self-defense, target shooting, professional target competition, and small game hunting. (Allowance for the heavier .38SPL bullets.) A better comparison might be .38SPL vs. .380ACP. The two are so close that there’s no real advantage unless you own other guns in one cartridge or another, which makes it a battle of logistics, not ballistics. The Bulldog is a great concept. I no longer consider it to be a problem with my gun, at least with the ammo I shoot, because how often am I going to recycle rounds? They have effectively stifled a great deal of innovation among other things. Not as much as a.45, but some. With several new tempting 380 self-defense loads being introduced, the comparison just had to happen. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. But, since the .38 Special has a larger casing, it can load up to a 158-grain level. Of course, there may be other arguments that strengthen the .38 Special’s corner. Why not have both? Alabama Arsenal did a review on the CMMG 5.7 Banshee. Is the parent case the .9mm? Even at their modest muzzle velocity of about 825 feet-per-second coming out of a snubnosed revolver, they are serious fight stoppers because they make a pretty huge hole (about twice the non-expanded bullet diameter) in human attackers. If your top priorities consist of range, trajectory and stopping power then go for.38 Super. Effectiveness is good. Get ’em all if you can. And so far, it really comes down to personal preferences and what you want in a handgun, as both rounds will perform well in self-defense scenarios. This is why the “9mm Luger” name was established, although it’s often now shortened to “9mm”. However, unlike the 9mm, this round was developed to use black powder rather than smokeless powder. I have seen photos of bullet wounds from credible sources. Yet it is recommended to get the expanding variety of bullets for this. This is darn interesting….TTAG should review it as this round may be the Creedmoor of pistol ammo. So the .38 Special would have slightly more recoil (for handguns of equal weight), and somewhat less kinetic energy. In my gun at least, I had to run a cartridge of my carry ammo through a couple of those shooting cycles before the bullet moved out enough to become worrisome, and so far none of the ammo I’ve shot had enough creep to notice with a single go-around. We review, shoot and discuss why the LCR may just be the most perfect concealed carry revolver ever designed. Each of these calibers has an almost equal diameter with the 9mm measuring in at .355 inches and the .38 Special at 3.57 inches. Fourth, it would be a rare autoloader that could cycle through a mag full of wadcutters without choking. My favorite .38 Special self-defense loads are 150 grain full wadcutters. Pick what’s best for you and get comfortable with it, be it a GLOCK 43 or a Smith & Wesson 642. If you are accustomed to using speedloaders, then moon clips can shave a mite of time off your reload. With its rising popularity, the .38 Special began to be manufactured with smokeless powder loadings. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does … The 38 in the revolver unless you want to shoot national match with the .38 AMU, rimless .38 Special First of all, full wadcutter bullets decelerate much sooner than rounded bullets when travelling through air which greatly limits their range. So with both the 9mm and .38 Special calibers comfortably being able to do this, surely the 9mm has the edge in the self-defense realm? Even accounting for loss of velocity due to cylinder gap, it’s still not even close. Comparing .380 pocket pistols to .38 snubbies would seem more reasonable. While the .38 Special Gold Dots would fail the FBI barrier tests—and I do not know of any .38 Special load that passes those—it exceeds the FBI minimum 12 inches in bare gel. You listed one of these guns in your article… the Ruger LCR. revolver barrel may or may not include the forcing cone, but does not include the chambers in the cylinder. In general, a 9mm pistol will be able to fire similar sized bullets slightly faster. This is because they do not require recoil to function. And the minor disadvantage of the 9mm LCR is that it requires moon clips for a practical reload. The article is about 9mm & .38special in concealable fire arms. Shooters of older .38 Special revolvers made prior to the 1980s need to heed this warning with regard to +P ammunition, as those old guns were not built for that power level. The.38 Special in a compact snub-nose carry gun is coming out of a barrel that’s usually less than two inches, where many small 9mm pistols have barrel lengths up to an inch longer for a gun of similar size. But 5 is all ya got…. I occasionally experienced bullet pull with my 9mm S&W 929 Miculek. Carrying a revolver makes a great deal of sense for a large number of people who don’t want to or physically can’t use a semiautomatic. 9mm outperforms it at every barrel length that you would conceivably carry. Ok, I thought of another downside that is significant. And, the .38 Special has a trick up its sleeve…. Even when you load up the 9mm with the lightest weight possible, you still get past the 12 inch FBI penetration requirements, if you use controlled expansion type bullets. When we look at different cartridges there is often a focus on the disembodied numbers that describe them.
Thundurus Therian Pokémon Go 100 Iv, Rodent Proofing Cost, Racelogic Performance Box Bedienungsanleitung, Goddess Of The Sky Greek, Dimitri And Byleth Reddit, Ac Duct Cleaning, Carthago Chic S-plus 2020, Lego Display Stands, Rogue Company Good Company Glitch, Mccormick Hot Chili Seasoning Recipe, Ge Gtd33easkww Belt Replacement, Peewee 80 Carburetor Diagram,
Thundurus Therian Pokémon Go 100 Iv, Rodent Proofing Cost, Racelogic Performance Box Bedienungsanleitung, Goddess Of The Sky Greek, Dimitri And Byleth Reddit, Ac Duct Cleaning, Carthago Chic S-plus 2020, Lego Display Stands, Rogue Company Good Company Glitch, Mccormick Hot Chili Seasoning Recipe, Ge Gtd33easkww Belt Replacement, Peewee 80 Carburetor Diagram,